Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes
Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown.METHODS:
We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes.RESULTS:
After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates.CONCLUSIONS:
Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.
|LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:||Case Series / Case Control / Cohort|
|MESH HEADINGS:||Adult; Female; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; HLA Antigens; Healthcare Disparities; Histocompatibility; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Isoantibodies; Kidney Transplantation; Living Donors; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States|